PORTFOLIO ENTRY # 3

Case Study of Freedom of Speech

"Do you think such restrictions and censorship of free speech are necessary? Explain your reasons."

Restrictions and censorship of free speech is definitely necessary. People may think it's a small thing, but the freedom of speech is not a small thing at all.


"Human rights may be limited
Human rights may be subject only to reasonable limits set by Territory laws that can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society."

Limiting human rights

The Charter recognizes that human rights may be limited in certain circumstances. Under the Charter, rights may be limited when justified in a free and democratic society, taking into account relevant factors including:

• What are the values underlying the human right?

The Values underlying the human rights are: 

• Respect for other people
• Tolerance of different points of view
• Participation of staff in decision-making
• Transparency in the decision-making process
• Accountability of managers, staff and office-holders
• Fair pay and terms of service
• Good working conditions
• Sensitivity on issues of gender.

These are the values that people must not forget. People might find it a small thing, but it is very important for mankind to find their humanity.

• Is the right being limited very important in international law? (for example, the prohibition against torture)

The right being limited is Yes,, the application to human rights is giving people a chance. A chance against abuses and government itself, but it must also be limited so it wont be abuse in its own way.

• Is the purpose for limiting the right very important?

The purpose for limiting the right is VERY IMPORTANT. People must know that we have our own rights but we mustn't abuse it. Despite our right, there are laws that if abuse it, out right will be the 

• What sort of limitation is being proposed? To what extent does it limit the right?

The limitations proposed are that there rights are applicable only if they've met the requirements of both territory and following the judgement of the democratic process.

Chat Conversation End

• Is the limitation proposed likely to achieve its purpose?

It might achieve its purpose if people follow through with utmost honesty and integrity. AS LONG AS no one abuses their rights and as long as democratic process isn't abused as well.

• Are there less restrictive means reasonably available to achieve this purpose? This allows a balance to be struck between people’s rights and a need for public authorities to protect the broader public interest.

No, there isn't 'cause it's the only way to give compromise to both parties.

• Cite an example of human rights that the Philippines is now experiencing. Share your point of view. 

Philippine's drug war is an example of it. Some, if not all, are victims of the abuse of right to due process. It's almost inhumane. In my opinion, they shouldn't kill people on the spot, who knows, maybe there are just framed and are innocent.

Portfolio Entry#1

Scenario 1

The problem in scenario 1 is, Lorna readily helps her friend Bill. It's not bad to help, but in this situation, Lorna is spoon feeding Bill. She is willing to help him as a friend, but as the administrative assistant in the Human Resources, it is also her duty to make sure her friend will be able to give contribution to the company. Spoon feeding her friend will be a big mistake. Bill must know how to stand on his own. If Bill rely on Lorna too much, he might became a burden to Lorna. And the possibility of abusing Lorna's position and power.
 
Most bearing facts in this scenario is Lorna's desire to help his friend, Bill. Helping someone through connection is indeed a good way to be recommended in a company. But, helping someone by spoon feeding them is definitely not a good way. Giving an official copy of the interview questions is one big bad example.


Lorna will be the one most affected by her decision. Firstly, because Bill might rely on her too much and might end up not doing her job properly. Secondly, if ever Bill will tell to others about Lorna giving him a copy of the actual interview questions. Lorna's position will be be in danger. Her action will be known as nepotism. Her small act of kindness might cost her -her job.

Bill will also be affected. Lorna's kindness might backfire on him, and might end up not helping him at all. If other people will know that he knew the exact interview questions, they will doubt his ability. People might call him incompetent. Rumors about Bill might result Bill's work performance or worst- his confidence.


If Lorna really want to help his friend that bad that she gave him the copy, then, one thing that I would make sure to do about the issue is, Lorna must not do it again. To save her job and her friend. There are always second chances. But Lorna must also know that not helping his friend is also a way of helping him not to rely to her or it would help him to stand on his own abilities.

If Bill got accepted, thanks to the copy, then, first thing I would do about the issue is, he must not tell that he got accept because Lorna's big help. He will have to work hard and in time, he will learn to become better. Because, if ever he told someone and they think he only got in because on his strong connection, then he will have to learn to become a better person for his job. He must show everyone that he deserve his job and he work hard for it. It will show that he is worth being accepted in then company. If not, then it'll just show he's not up to the job.


The best action in this issue is Lorna will be better off telling him the hardest possible question than giving him all the questions. It will be better for him to be accepted on the company by his own ability, though he might need a little advice. What matters is he'll be accepted with his ability and he knows he can do the things will be taking responsibilities in his work. This alternative action accepts all the rules. This is indeed the best action.

The worst action is Lorna giving the copy and getting caught. This action will really cost her her own job and power. It will harm her the most. Physically and mentally. Getting fired is really the result no one wants, even Lorna. It might also affect Bill's interview. Lorna's one simple kindness might take both hers and Bill's opportunities and power. This alternative actions is not recommended, in my opinion, it contradicts the rules.

The normal action I can give is not giving the copy nor give any hints or clues. This action might severs Lorna and Bill's friendship. Helping a friend is normal but not helping at all is different. If ever Bill got accepted but got no help from Lorna, their relationship will get more awkward. But, if they are not stubborn friends, their friendship can still be salvage if Lorna apologies. This alternative action is not the best but not the worst either. 


The best action to take is to help Bill by giving simple hints but a sure questions that will be in the interview than giving Bill the entire interview questions. The simplest and almost common actions by other. If it were me, I would pick this actions. It is best to help people but it's better to also know that helping too much is wrong.